| A
Brief History of Atlantic Salmon in Western Mass.
©2006
By Joe Overlock
For
this months article I thought it would be fun to
look
into the history of Atlantic Salmon here in
Western Massachusetts. As many of you already know,
Atlantic Salmon used to dominate our streams here in
New England. The early settlers made reports of salmon
runs so large that they would fill up entire rivers.
Farmers would use pitch forks to spear the salmon and
toss them on the river banks by the hundreds. Field & Stream
Magazine published an interesting fact in one of their
magazines a few years ago. They stated that in Colonial
New England, England made more money selling Salmon
then Spain ever did with their quests for gold in all
of the Americas.
In
Robert J. Behnke’s book “Trout and
Salmon of North America” he reports historic
runs only stretched as far south and the Housitonic
River in Connecticut. But in doing my own research
I found a copy of “The American Angler’s
Guide” by J.J. Brown, published in 1849. In it
he reports Atlantic Salmon as being netted in the Hudson
River in New York in June of 1844. There is also mention
of a law in New York State prohibiting the taking of
salmon by net, hook, or spear “or any other device
whatsoever” in the months of October and November.
There is no mention of a date on which the law was
put into effect though.
Being
that the Hoosic is part of the Hudson River Watershed,
it’s not out of the question that
both our major watersheds here in Berkshire County
(the Hoosic and Housitonic) could have once held salmon
runs. We may never know the size of those runs or if
they happened at all, but we do know that the Connecticut
River once contained an enormous run of Atlantic Salmon.
In the late 1700’s two dams where built on the
Connecticut bringing centuries of salmon runs to an
end (Hadley 1794, Turners Falls 1798). It only took
twelve short years for Atlantic Salmon to become extinct
in the tributaries of the Connecticut in Vermont, New
Hampshire, and northern Massachusetts including the
Deerfield River. But anglers even then saw the impending
doom of over fishing the salmon long before these two
dams where built.
The Beginning of Commercial Fishing in the Connecticut
River
The
earliest account of salmon fishing the Connecticut
I’ve
found is from the minutes of a Town Meeting in Springfield,
MA in 1688 and they are as follows
(note the original spellings):
1677 -- Minutes of May 2, 1677 town meeting of the
Town of Springfield, Mass.:
"Further also Goodm. Lamb, Serjeant Morgan, Joseph
Crowfoot, John Clarke Sr., Charles Ferry with such
others as they shal take in with them have ye liberty
of fishing for this yeere from ye falls in Chickuppi
River where the wading place is, down to ye mouth of
that river, provided they enter not upon any mans lands
or proprietyes there, provided they also shal supply
such neighbors as shal desire to have fish of them; & their
Salmon they may not sel for more than six pence apiece
there, or at ye town more than eight pence, and shad
fish they may not sel for more than half pence apiece
there, or more than a penny at the Town, & in case
they barrel up for market, they are to allow to the
Town twelve pence a barrel for all that shal be transported."
To
translate that into modern term, those guys where
selling Atlantic
Salmon for 6 cents locally, 8 cents
in the city per fish, not per pound. Salmon where so
abundant in our rivers they would even feed them to
pigs! Now let’s fast forward 66 years to 1743.
On March 1, 1743 we find the first attempt to protect
salmon fishing in the Connecticut Watershed, more specifically,
the Deerfield. The resolve reads as follows:
“Resolve by the General Court, March 1, 1743, "Ordered
that the Salmon Fishing Falls in Deerfield River, so
called, be reserved for the use of the public, with
20 acres around them for conveniency of fishing."”
Then
on February 9, 1779 a law was passed for the Westfield
River (it was called the Agawam River back
then) banning the taking of salmon by “seines,
nets, pots, or otherwise". The law also called
for the destruction of any “wears, fence-hurdles,
and other incumbrances whatsoever” on the river
to give the salmon a clear path for their spawn.
The Act of 1788
By
1788 the salmon in the Connecticut where so over
fished
that several towns in Hampshire County gathered
together and sent a petition to the Senate & House
of Representatives calling for action. On June 20,
1788 a law passed called "An Act to Prevent the
Destruction of Salmon and Shad in Connecticut River." This
limited salmon netting to only four days a week, banned
any type of fishing at South Hadley falls and a mile
downstream, and limited the length of the nets used
to “20 rods”. The proposal was very strongly
worded and you could tell that the local residents
where very concerned by the problem, here’s a
excerpt from it: “By reason of the great number
of seines and nets, which are constantly used during
the fishing season, in taking Salmon and Shad in Connecticut
River, they have decreased for a number of years past, & that
there is a great danger the fishery in said river will
be destroyed;” Man, were they right, but it wasn’t
the over fishing that would lead to their demise.
In
1790 and 1791 Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire
all
jumped on board with the Act of 1788 and things
where looking good for the salmon and shad of the Connecticut
River. The citizens where concerned for the river as
a whole and realized that “We all live downstream”.
The Beginning of the End
In
1792, when John Hancock was governor of Massachusetts
and
George Washington was in his first term as president,
a company that would later turn into today’s
Western Massachusetts Power Company was chartered by
the General Court of Massachusetts as "the Proprietors
of the Locks and Canals on the Connecticut River." The
purpose of the proprietors was to improve the navigability
of the river from the mouth of the Chicopee River to
the Vermont/New Hampshire state line.
In 1794, the proprietors decided that the development
of navigation on the river would be better served by
dividing the project between two separate companies.
Accordingly, the General Court chartered the proprietors
of the Upper Locks and Canals on the Connecticut River
to operate from the mouth of the Deerfield River northerly
to the state line. The responsibility of the original
company became the area between the mouth of the Chicopee
River and the mouth of the Deerfield River.
That
same year, the proprietors started work on a log-crib
dam extending across the Connecticut River
at a place called "Great Falls" (now Turners
Falls). A canal 2.5 miles long and 20 feet wide was
constructed from the dam to a point downstream near
the mouth of the Deerfield River. Included in the construction
were several locks and the equipment and structures.
A towpath was on the easterly shore of the canal along
which teams of horses and mules did the towing. The
canal had several locks. Upstream a dam and single-lock
canal was built near the mouth of the Millers River,
allowing barges to bypass the French King rapids. The
canals were opened for business in 1798, and by 1802
there was regular freight traffic by boat from Long
Island Sound to Bellows Falls, Vermont.
Big business prevailed over environmental concerns.
And just to add insult to injury, on March 11, 1797
the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives
repealed The Act of 1788 that protected the salmon
and shad from over fishing. After 9 years in effect
they deemed the act unnecessary. By 1806 Atlantic Salmon
where extinct in the upper stretches of the Connecticut.
The
citizens wouldn’t accept this defeat though.
What few salmon that still existed in the river they
wanted to protect. In 1818 a law was passed banning
any type of fishing for salmon and shad within 1.5
miles of the Hadley dam. But it was all for nothing.
The dams had won.
Today
Today there are more than 1000 dams in the entire
Connecticut River Basin. The current restoration of
Atlantic salmon to the Connecticut River basin began
in 1967. It is a major cooperative effort between the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine
Fisheries Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the North
Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization, State fish
and wildlife departments in the watershed, private
organizations, and industry. The Connecticut River
Atlantic Salmon Commission was established by Congress
in 1983 to provide guidance to these many entities
and to ensure cooperation. Management practices include
raising salmon in hatcheries, capturing and spawning
sea-run Atlantic salmon, stocking juveniles in tributaries,
and providing access to habitat by building fish passage
facilities. These cooperative management efforts have
resulted in the successful reintroduction of Atlantic
salmon to the Connecticut River watershed.
Despite the large number of hatchery raised salmon
being introduced into the Connecticut River every year,
the returning numbers are still low. In 2005, fish
counters only spotted 186 salmon returning. A river
that once held enough salmon to feed a nation, now
barely holds enough returning salmon to fill a small
pond.
I
once heard a historian say, “If history teaches
us anything it’s that we never learn from history.” I
think this is an awfully negative way to look at life
but in many ways it’s true. The same arguments
are still going on today. The battle between environment
and big business still wages on. Our voices are louder
now thanks to communication tools like the Internet,
but despite this business men and politicians still
propose new ways to destroy our environment, all in
the name of progress. We live in an age where it’s
unsafe to eat the fish in the streams or take a drink
from the waters. The sad thing is that the average
person has accepted that as normal. That is why it’s
important to get involved with a good environmental
organization. Join your local Trout Unlimited Chapter
or Watershed Council, get educated, and get active.
|